we ek |
Due date |
Assignments | Solutions |
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
Wed 0917 |
h1 |
h1s
|
4 |
Wed 0924 | h2 Students of section 102 can skip
the last two problems from §1.6 since we did not cover enough on
0917 lecture |
h2s |
5 |
Wed 1001 |
midterm exam 1 Practice: Fall 2009 mt1 and its solution (#1b is not covered; #3b uses integration factor mu(y)); Spring 2010 mt1 and its solution (#3 uses integration factor mu(y); #4 is for mt2) |
mt1s
afternoon-mt1s |
6 |
Wed 1008 | h3 | h3s |
7 |
Wed 1015 |
h4 |
h4s |
8 |
Wed 1022 |
h5 | h5s |
9 |
Wed 1029 |
h6 |
h6s |
10 |
Wed 1105 |
midterm exam 2 Revised table of Laplace transform to be provided in the exam Practice: Fall 2009 mt2 and its solution; Spring 2010 mt2 and its solution |
mt2s
afternoon-mt2s |
11 |
Wed 1112 |
h7 | h7s |
12 |
Wed 1119 |
h8 | h8s |
13 |
Wed 1126 |
h9 | h9s
|
Mon 1215 |
final exam:
Mon Dec. 15th at 3:30 pm, Student Recreation Centre Room 200A
(Room A of SRC A-B-C) Revised table of Laplace transform to be provided in the exam: same as above Practice: Fall 2007 final and its solution; Fall 2009 final and its solution; Spring 2010 final and its solution all past exams |
"It is the same as the previous problem (6.3.3):" and then they wrote the final answer.This problem is not exactly similar to 6.3.3. Their final answers are different and so you were supposed to write clearly all steps.