**Advice:**
Defining functions

Here is a correct way of defining a function:

`> `
**f:= x -> x^2 + 1;**

You can then evaluate such a function with a constant or variable argument:

`> `
**f(u);**

`> `
**f(3);**

Similarly, for a function of several variables (note the parentheses):

`> `
**g:= (x,y) -> x+y^2;**

`> `
**g(u,v);**

On the other hand, the following defines an expression rather than a function:

`> `
**h:= x^2 + 1;**

This is no problem if that's what you wanted, but functions and expressions are used in different ways. In particular, you get a strange-looking result if you try to evaluate
**h**
as you would a function:

`> `
**h(u);**

In order to evaluate
**h**
for some value of
**x**
, you must use
**subs**
.

`> `
**subs(x=u, h);**

Since in ordinary mathematics we often speak of "the function
", a common beginner's mistake is to define
**f(x)**
instead of defining
**f**
.

`> `
**F(x):= x^2 + 1;**

Beware! Everything seems fine, as long as you use only
**F(x)**
. But when you try to use
**F**
with some other argument, it appears to be undefined:

`> `
**F(u);**

This is not surprising, since in fact it is only
**F(x)**
, and not
**F**
of anything else, that you have defined.

There is a legitimate use of such a construction (it places a value in the remember table of
**F**
).

**See also:**
__function__
,
__remember__
,
__subs__

**Maple Advisor Database **
R. Israel, 1997